Track A
Signal reliability in real-world use
Evaluation of signal stability across routine, ambulatory, and context-variable conditions.
Research program
Research in service of better care
This program focuses on methods, signal quality, and interpretable outputs intended to be useful in real-world care settings.
We publish only when evidence quality and documentation standards are met.
- Scope
- Non-diagnostic evidence generation for healthcare settings.
- Study posture
- Protocol-led, validation-first, published after predefined quality gates.
- Primary outputs
- Validation briefs, methods notes, and publication-ready summaries.
- Audience
- Researchers, healthcare systems, and implementation teams.
Areas of inquiry
Active investigation tracks
Work is described at a high level until analyses and materials are ready for release.
Track B
Interpretability of inferred patterns
Assessment of whether patterns remain stable, explainable, and clinically relevant across time.
Track C
Uncertainty communication and decision safety
Evaluation of whether insight language supports action while preserving uncertainty boundaries.
Publication protocol
How we publish
The standard is conservative: technically robust, context-complete, and suitable for external interpretation.
01
Protocol + acceptance criteria
Research questions, methods, and acceptance criteria are defined before drafting any output.
02
Reproducibility + review
Results are checked for reproducibility and documented with assumptions, constraints, and scope limits.
03
Release + dissemination
Validated outputs are released with methods context and intended-use framing.
Publication posture
This page serves as a record of validated outputs intended to responsibly inform healthcare teams, researchers, and implementation partners. Publication cadence follows evidentiary readiness and review completion, not marketing timelines.